Goodbye traditional buying: how affordability is rewriting the real estate playbook

Traditionally, buyers would search for homes based on location, property type or asking price. 

However, affordability concerns have led many buyers to reverse that process, says online property portal MyProperty. 

It says that rather than focusing solely on the selling price, buyers are increasingly considering the monthly repayment they would be comfortable paying and then working backwards to determine which properties fall within that range.

This approach is said to often provide a more realistic picture of what is achievable, and can help buyers avoid the disappointment of falling in love with homes that may ultimately be beyond their reach.

“It also reflects a growing awareness that the cost of owning a home extends far beyond the bond repayment.” 

Affordability extends beyond the purchase price

For the majority of 2026, affordability has not been just about the purchase price for many South African home buyers. It is about whether the monthly repayment, rates, taxes, levies, insurance, transport costs and everyday expenses still fit comfortably within their budget.

While homeownership remains a goal for many households, buyers are becoming increasingly practical in how they search for property. Instead of starting with a dream suburb or a specific type of home, many are said to be beginning with a more fundamental question: What can I realistically afford?

This shift is changing the way South Africans approach the property market, MyProperty says, adding that buyers are becoming more budget-led. 

A look beyond the purchase price

The affordability gap is not always created by rising property prices alone, the portal says. It says that many buyers are discovering that the ongoing costs associated with homeownership can have a significant impact on their budget.

“Buyers now take into account all the various costs of owning a home, from municipal rates and taxes to levies and even transport and commuting costs. They look at properties with cost-saving features like solar and boreholes; they weigh up whether the maintenance and repairs will be worth the price and effort.

“As a result, buyers are taking a more holistic view of affordability when evaluating potential purchases.” 

The picture quickly changes: a home that appears affordable based on its selling price, but it could place far greater pressure on a household budget once all the associated costs are considered, MyProperty says. 

Unaffordability impacting choice

For some buyers, affordability challenges are leading to changes in what they are looking for. However, the portal says this does not necessarily mean abandoning homeownership goals altogether. Instead, many buyers are exploring alternative ways to enter the market.

On the other hand, the market is said to have responded accordingly. More buyers are said to be considering apartments and townhouses instead of freestanding homes; they are moving away from the established areas and exploring emerging suburbs that offer better value for money, and purchasing smaller properties with room for future expansion if needed.

More buyers are also prioritising essential features over luxury extras. Today’s buyer wants a home with top-notch security features or an easy commute; they don’t care about the same things buyers cared about a few years ago, MyProperty adds. 

These adjustments often allow buyers to remain active in the market while still maintaining financial stability, it says. 

According to MyProperty, one of the biggest misconceptions about affordability is that it can be determined by a single number. In reality, the portal says affordability is highly personal.

“Two households earning the same income may have very different financial commitments, savings goals and lifestyle preferences.”

Understand your own financial position

“This is why understanding your own financial position remains one of the most important steps before beginning a property search. Buyers who take the time to assess their budget realistically are often better positioned to identify suitable properties, make competitive offers and navigate the home-buying process with confidence.” 

South Africa’s property market continues to offer opportunities for buyers, but the way people search for homes is evolving, the portal says. 

It says that as affordability becomes a more important consideration, buyers are placing greater emphasis on realistic budgeting, long-term financial sustainability and understanding the full cost of homeownership.

Buyers are increasingly focused on what they can comfortably afford

Rather than focusing only on what they would like to buy, today’s buyers are increasingly focused on what they can comfortably afford, and that shift may ultimately lead to better purchasing decisions and more sustainable homeownership in the years ahead, the portal says. 

On Wednesday, Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) announced that consumer inflation jumped to 4.5% in May from 4.0% in April, reaching the highest rate since July 2024, when it was 4.6%. The monthly change in the consumer price index (CPI) was 0.7% in May.

The statistical agency says the inflation surge was largely driven by increases in fuel prices.

“The fuel index is said to have recorded a second large monthly increase, leaping by 14.3% to reach an annual rise of 28.7%. Over the past 12 months, petrol prices increased by 24.8% and diesel by 53.8%.” 

Housing and utilities inflation continued its gradual increase

The Nedbank Group Economic Unit says that housing and utilities inflation continued its gradual increase, rising from 5.2% (year-on-year) to 5.3%, driven by electricity costs. 

The unit says electricity and other fuels increased by 9.4%, reflecting the effect of the 8.76% Eskom’s tariff increase, which came into effect on 1 April. “Meanwhile, maintenance and repair costs, actual rentals for housing, and owners’ equivalent rent remained steady.” 

Encouragingly, food inflation is said to have continued to moderate, easing from 2.8% to a 14-month low of 1.6%. The moderation was broad-based among the food categories. 

Compare listings

Compare